CVE-2009-3609

NONECVSS 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 4%CVSS: —Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Integer overflow in the ImageStream::ImageStream function in Stream.cc in Xpdf before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1, as used in GPdf, kdegraphics KPDF, and CUPS pdftops, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted PDF document that triggers a NULL pointer dereference or buffer over-read.

CVSS v3
—
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
90.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 21, 2009

Last Modified

April 23, 2026

References (102)

Patch Availability(14)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibpoppler4 (0.10.5-1ubuntu2.4) @ jaunty2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulibpoppler5 (0.12.0-0ubuntu2.1) @ karmic2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntukword (1:1.6.3-7ubuntu6.1) @ jaunty2026-05-30ubuntu
redhatcups-1:1.1.22-0.rc1.9.32.el4_8.102010-10-07redhat
redhattetex-0:3.0-33.8.el5_5.52010-05-06redhat
redhattetex-0:1.0.7-67.192010-05-06redhat
redhattetex-0:2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.162010-05-06redhat
redhatpoppler-0:0.5.4-4.4.el5_4.112009-10-15redhat
redhatxpdf-1:2.02-17.el32009-10-15redhat
redhatcups-1:1.3.7-11.el5_4.32009-10-15redhat
redhatgpdf-0:2.8.2-7.7.2.el4_8.52009-10-15redhat
redhatxpdf-1:3.00-22.el4_8.12009-10-15redhat
redhatkdegraphics-7:3.3.1-15.el4_8.22009-10-15redhat
redhatkdegraphics-7:3.5.4-15.el5_4.22009-10-15redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-07 15:12 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 48 more
  1. 2026-06-19 02:43 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-05-30 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-05-30 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-05-30 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-23 00:37 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-20 11:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2009-3609?
CVE-2009-3609 is a none vulnerability published on October 21, 2009. Integer overflow in the ImageStream::ImageStream function in Stream.cc in Xpdf before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1, as used in GPdf, kdegraphics KPDF, and CUPS pdftops, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted PDF document that triggers a NULL…
When was CVE-2009-3609 disclosed?
CVE-2009-3609 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 21, 2009, with the most recent update on April 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2009-3609 actively exploited?
CVE-2009-3609 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 90.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2009-3609?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2009-3609, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2009-3609

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-3609?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs