CVE-2009-3475

HIGHCVSS v2 · 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 7.5 — v2 rates that HIGH (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 0.9% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.

Sources: epss, nvd_v2
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS v2: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a '\0' character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
7.5HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
7.5(low)
EG Risk
39(Track)
EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
57%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 29, 2009

Last Modified

April 23, 2026

References (12)

Affected Packages

(19 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:5.0(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml1.1.1-2, 1.1.1-2+lenny1~bpo40+11.1.1-2+lenny1—
opensaml22.0-22.0-2+lenny1—
shibboleth-sp1.3.1.dfsg1-3, 1.3.1.dfsg1-3+lenny1~bpo40+11.3.1.dfsg1-3+lenny1—
shibboleth-sp22.0.dfsg1-42.0.dfsg1-4+lenny1—
xmltooling1.0-21.0-2+lenny1—
Debian:11(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml—3.0.0-2—
shibboleth-sp—3.0.2+dfsg1-2—
xmltooling—1.2.2-1—
Debian:12(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml—3.0.0-2—
shibboleth-sp—3.0.2+dfsg1-2—
xmltooling—1.2.2-1—
Debian:13(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml—3.0.0-2—
shibboleth-sp—3.0.2+dfsg1-2—
xmltooling—1.2.2-1—
Debian:14(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml—3.0.0-2—
shibboleth-sp—3.0.2+dfsg1-2—
xmltooling—1.2.2-1—
Debian:4.0(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
opensaml1.1a-21.1a-2+etch1—
shibboleth-sp1.3f.dfsg1-21.3f.dfsg1-2+etch1—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 119 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-27 14:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-26 03:09 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-15 01:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-09 19:40 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-08-09 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 16:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 13:39 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.50
  14. 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 20:12 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-23 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-23 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 15:41 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-19 03:05 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-30 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-05-30 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2009-3475?
CVE-2009-3475 is a high vulnerability published on September 29, 2009. Internet2 Shibboleth Service Provider software 1.3.x before 1.3.3 and 2.x before 2.2.1, when using PKIX trust validation, does not properly handle a '\0' character in the subject or subjectAltName fields of a certificate, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL…
When was CVE-2009-3475 disclosed?
CVE-2009-3475 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 29, 2009, with the most recent update on April 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2009-3475 actively exploited?
CVE-2009-3475 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 43.2% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2009-3475?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2009-3475, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2009-3475

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-3475?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs