The JavaScript engine in Mozilla Firefox before 3.0.12 and Thunderbird allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to (1) nsDOMClassInfo.cpp, (2) JS_HashTableRawLookup, and (3) MirrorWrappedNativeParent and js_LockGCThingRT.
CVE-2009-2466
Also known asEUVD-2009-2461 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-492q-86f5-c96f (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS
- —
- EchelonGraph score
- Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
- EG Score
- —
- EG Risk
- —
- EPSS PROB
- —
- EPSS %ILE
- —
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 22, 2009
Last Modified
August 7, 2024
References (25)
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-265068-1Vendor Advisory
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9820VDB Entry · Signature
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1020800.1-1Vendor Advisory
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0153.htmlVendor Advisory
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-July/msg01032.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36145 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35944 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0650VDB Entry
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493281
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35943 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00005.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1162.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-34.html
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465980
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0154.htmlVendor Advisory
15 of 25 shown · show the other 10
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35758 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)VDB Entry
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2152VDB Entry
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454704
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36005 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1163.htmlVendor Advisory
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35947 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-08/msg00002.htmlVendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494445
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35914 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1972VDB Entry
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2009-2466(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2010:0154Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: thunderbird security update
- RHSA-2010:0153Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: thunderbird security update
- RHSA-2009:1163Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: seamonkey security update
- RHSA-2009:1162Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: firefox security update
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | xulrunner-1.9 (1.9.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1) @ jaunty | 2026-11-15 | ubuntu |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:1.5.0.12-25.el4 | 2010-03-17 | redhat |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:2.0.0.24-2.el5_4 | 2010-03-17 | redhat |
| redhat | seamonkey-0:1.0.9-45.el4_8 | 2009-07-22 | redhat |
| redhat | xulrunner-0:1.9.0.12-1.el5_3 | 2009-07-22 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-15 04:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-15 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-15 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-492q-86f5-c96f · GitHub severity HIGH
Related CVEs(same vendor)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2009:1162 · redhat:RHSA-2010:0153
- CVE-2009-2463EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2009-2462EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-2470EG 5.0MEDIUM
- CVE-2010-0159EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2009-1571EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2009-3380EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-3075EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-3072EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-2469EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-2467EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
Frequently asked(3)
What is CVE-2009-2466?
When was CVE-2009-2466 made public?
How do I remediate CVE-2009-2466?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2009-2466
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-2466?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.