CVE-2009-0757

HIGHCVSS v2 · 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 7.5 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 1.5% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.5%CVSS v2: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Multiple buffer overflows in GNU MPFR 2.4.0 allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via the (1) mpfr_snprintf and (2) mpfr_vsnprintf functions.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
7.5HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
7.5HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.
Exploitation1.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.5%
EPSS %ILE
74th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 3, 2009

Last Modified

April 23, 2026

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulib64mpfr1 (2.4.0-1ubuntu3.1) @ jaunty2026-05-30ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 81 of 112 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 19 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 31 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  3. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  4. 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  5. 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  6. 2026-10-07 23:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  7. 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  8. 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  9. 2026-10-04 23:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  10. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  11. 2026-09-29 07:57 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  13. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  14. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  15. 2026-09-17 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  16. 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  17. 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  18. 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  19. 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  20. 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  21. 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  23. 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  24. 2026-08-27 14:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  25. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  2. 2026-08-15 01:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  3. 2026-08-09 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  4. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  5. 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  6. 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  7. 2026-07-30 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  8. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  9. 2026-07-26 13:37 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH
  10. 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  11. 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  12. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  13. 2026-07-23 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-23 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-23 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-22 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  18. 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  19. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  20. 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  21. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  23. 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  24. 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  25. 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  26. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  27. 2026-07-09 19:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  28. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  29. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  30. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  31. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  32. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  33. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
  34. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  35. 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  36. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  37. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  38. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  39. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  40. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  41. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  42. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  43. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  44. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  45. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  46. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  47. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
  48. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  49. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  50. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  51. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  52. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  53. 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  54. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  55. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile
  56. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 75th percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2009-0757?
CVE-2009-0757 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 3, 2009. Multiple buffer overflows in GNU MPFR 2.4.0 allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via the (1) mpfrsnprintf and (2) mpfrvsnprintf functions.
When was CVE-2009-0757 made public?
CVE-2009-0757 was made public on February 25, 2009: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, MITRE Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 3, 2009. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2009-0757 actively exploited?
CVE-2009-0757 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (74th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2009-0757?
A fix for CVE-2009-0757 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2009-0757

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-0757?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.