Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, when FORM authentication is used, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via requests to /j_security_check with malformed URL encoding of passwords, related to improper error checking in the (1) MemoryRealm, (2) DataSourceRealm, and (3) JDBCRealm authentication realms, as demonstrated by a % (percent) value for the j_password parameter.
CVE-2009-0580
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 4.3 — v2 rates that MEDIUM (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 94.4% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.
- 207 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 94%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB (verified), epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
A fix is available — apply it.
207 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2009-0580, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 4.3MEDIUMNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 62EG Risk 62/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation94% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 94%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
June 5, 2009
Last Modified
April 23, 2026
References (98)
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Mar/msg00001.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00002.html
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127420533226623&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129070310906557&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133469267822771&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136485229118404&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/35326
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/35344
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/35685
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/35788
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/37460
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/42368
- secalert@redhathttp://securitytracker.com/id?1022332
- secalert@redhathttp://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-263529-1
- secalert@redhathttp://support.apple.com/kb/HT4077
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2009-0580(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(10)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | tomcat6-examples (6.0.18-0ubuntu6.1) @ jaunty | 2026-07-23 | ubuntu |
| redhat | xml-commons-0:1.3.02-2jpp_1rh | 2010-08-04 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_18rh | 2009-11-30 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_4rh.16 | 2009-11-09 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat6-0:6.0.18-12.0.ep5.el5 | 2009-10-14 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp.9.6.ep5.el5 | 2009-09-21 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp.7.el5_3.2 | 2009-07-21 | redhat |
| redhat | xerces-j2-0:2.7.1-9jpp.ep1.2.el4 | 2009-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.3.0-5.GA_CP05.ep1.2.1.el5 | 2009-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.2.0-5.GA_CP07.ep1.1.1.el5 | 2009-07-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:5.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat5.5 | 5.5.26-5 |
| — |
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | — |
| — |
Additional Vendor Advisories
(11)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1143LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1143 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1144LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1144 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1145LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1145 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1146LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1146 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1164LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1164 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1454LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1454 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1506LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1506 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1562LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1562 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1563LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1563 — Low
- Red HatRHSA-2009:1616LOW2009-06-03
RHSA-2009:1616 — Low
- UbuntuUSN-788-1LOW
Tomcat vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-29 07:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 13:37 UTCEG score recompute▲ 4.30
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
Show 56 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-23 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 00:36 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
- 2026-07-23 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-30 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-30 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-33023✓ verifiedFirst seen Jun 3, 2009
Apache Tomcat 6.0.18 - Form Authentication Existing/Non-Existing 'Username' Enumeration
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/tomcat_enum✓ verifiedFirst seen Jan 1, 2009
Apache Tomcat User Enumeration
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:5.0:tomcat5.5 · Maven:org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
- CVE-2010-2227EG 6.4EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-2693EG 5.8EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2008-5515EG 5.0EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0033EG 5.0EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-2902EG 4.3EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0781EG 4.3EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0783EG 4.2MEDIUM
- CVE-2010-1157EG 2.6EPSS p99LOW
- CVE-2026-65905EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-43512EG 9.8CRITICAL
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2009:1143 · redhat:RHSA-2009:1164 · redhat:RHSA-2010:0602
- CVE-2008-5515EG 5.0EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0783EG 4.2MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0033EG 5.0EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2007-5333EG 5.0EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0781EG 4.3EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-2412EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2009-1955NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2007-5116EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2009-1891EG 7.1EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2010-0407EG 6.8MEDIUM
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2009-0580?
When was CVE-2009-0580 disclosed?
Is CVE-2009-0580 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2009-0580?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2009-0580
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-0580?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.