Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in dsmagent.exe in the Remote Agent Service in the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) client 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.8.2, 5.2.0.0 through 5.2.5.3, 5.3.0.0 through 5.3.6.4, and 5.4.0.0 through 5.4.1.96, and the TSM Express client 5.3.3.0 through 5.3.6.4, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a request packet that is not properly parsed by an unspecified "generic string handling function" or (2) a crafted NodeName in a dicuGetIdentifyRequest request packet, related to the (a) Web GUI and (b) Java GUI.
CVE-2008-4828
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 71% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 71%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 10.0HIGHlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 74EG Risk 74/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%The EG Score, 10.0 of 10.Exploitation71% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 71%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 5, 2009
Last Modified
April 23, 2026
References (9)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://osvdb.org/54231 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://osvdb.org/54232 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/32604 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-55/ (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third-party advisory (tagged Vendor Advisory by NVD)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21384389Patch · Vendor Advisory
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC59513Patch · Vendor Advisory
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503182/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1235
- PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware · CVE Programhttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50327
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 21 repeat rows among the latest 90 are merged into the row they repeat.
- 2026-10-12 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 04:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-26 13:36 UTCEG score recomputeAssessed again: 10.0 HIGH
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:35 UTCEG score recompute▼ 6.80
- 2026-07-23 00:02 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.8 MEDIUM
- 2026-07-22 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-30 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-30 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcq2-fc8w-fh67 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-27 13:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 98th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). No release with the fix is confirmed, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is applied.
- Exploit-DBEDB-16428✓ verifiedPublished May 9, 2010
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Express RCA Service - Remote Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/misc/ibm_tsm_rca_dicugetidentify✓ verifiedPublished Dec 20, 2009
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Express RCA Service Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-119
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2008-4828?
When was CVE-2008-4828 made public?
Is CVE-2008-4828 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2008-4828?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2008-4828
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2008-4828?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.