phShoutBox Final 1.5 and earlier only checks passwords when specified in $_POST, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by setting the (1) phadmin cookie to admin.php, or (2) in 1.4 and earlier, the ssbadmin cookie to shoutadmin.php.
CVE-2008-1971
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 7.5 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 2.2% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized) sets EG Risk's exploitation input, not EPSS. Confidence: LOW.
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2008 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 7.5HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 64EG Risk 64/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation65% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.Automatability30% × 15%EchelonGraph's default before algorithm v3.4: CISA had not published Automatable for this CVE.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2008. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. - EPSS PROB
- 2.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 82nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2008. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
April 27, 2008
Last Modified
April 23, 2026
References (4)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/29892 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third-party advisory (tagged Vendor Advisory by NVD)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28856 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Exploit
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41901
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5467
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 82 of 111 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 18 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 29 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-04 04:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
Show 57 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-26 13:35 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-23 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.2% · 90th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry). No fix is on record, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-5467✓ verifiedPublished Apr 18, 2008
PhShoutBox 1.5 - Insecure Cookie Handling
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2008-1971?
When was CVE-2008-1971 made public?
Is CVE-2008-1971 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2008-1971?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2008-1971
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2008-1971?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.