Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat 5.x before 5.5.22 and 6.x before 6.0.10, when using certain proxy modules (mod_proxy, mod_rewrite, mod_jk), allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence with combinations of (1) "/" (slash), (2) "\" (backslash), and (3) URL-encoded backslash (%5C) characters in the URL, which are valid separators in Tomcat but not in Apache.
CVE-2007-0450
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 90% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 0.4% of all CVEs). Confidence: see factors.
- 698 internet-exposed hosts are running an affected version right now
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 91%
A fix is available — apply it.
698 internet-exposed hosts are running an affected version of CVE-2007-0450 right now.
EchelonGraph is the only CVE feed that fuses live vulnerability intelligence with its own live internet-exposure radar — so you see not just that a CVE is exploited, but how much of the internet is exposed to it right now.
- CVSS v3
- —
- EG Score
- 9.0(low)
- EPSS
- 99.8%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 16, 2007
Last Modified
April 23, 2026
References (112)
- secalert@redhathttp://community.ca.com/blogs/casecurityresponseblog/archive/2009/01/23.aspx
- secalert@redhathttp://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306172
- secalert@redhathttp://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01178795
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce//2007/Jul/msg00004.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000003.html
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/24732
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/25106
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/25280
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/26235
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/26660
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/27037
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/28365
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/30899
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/30908
- secalert@redhathttp://secunia.com/advisories/33668
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2007-0450(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | xml-commons-0:1.3.02-2jpp_1rh | 2010-08-04 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.0.30-0jpp_10rh | 2008-06-30 | redhat |
| redhat | tyrex-0:1.0.1-2jpp_2rh | 2007-11-26 | redhat |
| redhat | jbossas-0:4.0.5-2.CP04.el4s1.2 | 2007-05-24 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_6rh | 2007-05-24 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_4rh.3 | 2007-05-21 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.3.el5 | 2007-05-14 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.0.30-0jpp_5rh | 2007-05-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | — | 6.0.10 | — |
Additional Vendor Advisories
(8)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2007:0326IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:0326 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2007:0327IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:0327 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2007:0328IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:0328 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2007:0340IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:0340 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2007:0360IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:0360 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2007:1069IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2007:1069 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2008:0261IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2008:0261 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2008:0524IMPORTANT2007-03-14
RHSA-2008:0524 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-31 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-21 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-29739✓ verifiedFirst seen Mar 14, 2007
Apache Tomcat 5.x/6.0.x - Directory Traversal
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor)
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2007-0450?
When was CVE-2007-0450 disclosed?
Is CVE-2007-0450 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2007-0450?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2007-0450
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2007-0450?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.