The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference.
CVE-2004-0079
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 9.5% (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 9.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 95th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
November 23, 2004
Last Modified
June 16, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated May 31, 2026'New OpenSSL releases fix denial of service attacks [17 March 2004]' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107953412903636&w=2Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openssl096b-0:0.9.6b-22.42 | 2005-11-02 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2005-11-02 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl096b-0:0.9.6b-16 | 2004-03-17 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2004-03-17 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2004-03-17 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:3.0(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
| openssl094 | 0.9.4-6, 0.9.4-6.potato.3, 0.9.4-6.woody.3 |
| — |
| openssl095 | 0.9.5a-6.woody.3 |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(5)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2004:120IMPORTANT2004-03-17
RHSA-2004:120 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2004:121IMPORTANT2004-03-17
RHSA-2004:121 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2004:139IMPORTANT2004-03-17
RHSA-2004:139 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2005:829IMPORTANT2004-03-17
RHSA-2005:829 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2005:830IMPORTANT2004-03-17
RHSA-2005:830 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-10 19:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-09 19:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 23:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-06 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-05 18:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-05 17:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 02:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 00:47 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-11 14:33 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-26 14:18 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-25 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-20 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 08:45 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-08 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-02 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-20 21:12 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-11 13:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-31 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-31 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-31 02:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-24 16:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 11:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 11:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 10:33 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:3.0:openssl094 · Debian:3.0:openssl095 · Debian:3.0:openssl
- CVE-2002-0655EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2002-0656EG 7.5EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2002-0657EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2005-2969EG 5.0EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2004-0081EG 5.0EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2002-0659EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2003-0545EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2003-0543EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2003-0544EG 5.0EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2003-0131EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
Same vendor
4 shownredhat:RHSA-2004:120 · redhat:RHSA-2004:139
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-476
- CVE-2004-0458EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2004-0389NVD 7.5EG 8.2EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2004-0119NVD 7.5EG 7.8EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2004-0365EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2005-0772NVD 7.5EG 7.7EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2005-2459EG 5.0EPSS p91MEDIUM
- CVE-2003-1000EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2003-1013EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2005-3274EG 4.7MEDIUM
- CVE-2006-2661EG 5.0EPSS p97MEDIUM
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2004-0079?
When was CVE-2004-0079 disclosed?
Is CVE-2004-0079 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2004-0079?
How do I remediate CVE-2004-0079?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2004-0079
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2004-0079?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.