Off-by-one error in the fb_realpath() function, as derived from the realpath function in BSD, may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated in wu-ftpd 2.5.0 through 2.6.2 via commands that cause pathnames of length MAXPATHLEN+1 to trigger a buffer overflow, including (1) STOR, (2) RETR, (3) APPE, (4) DELE, (5) MKD, (6) RMD, (7) STOU, or (8) RNTO.
CVE-2003-0466
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 78% (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 78%
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB (verified), epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation78% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 78%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
August 27, 2003
Last Modified
June 16, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Oct 1, 2026'Off-by-one Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in BSD libc realpath(3)' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106002488209129&w=2'wu-ftpd-2.6.2 off-by-one remote exploit.' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106001702232325&w=2'FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106001410028809&w=2'wu-ftpd fb_realpath() off-by-one bug' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=105967301604815&w=2Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | patch | 2003-07-31 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2003-07-31 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:3.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wu-ftpd | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 4× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 14:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-20 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-02 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 36 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-20 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-20 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-20 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-19 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-19 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-19 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Publicly available exploits
(5 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (5 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-78✓ verifiedFirst seen Aug 11, 2003
WU-FTPD 2.6.2 - Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-22975✓ verifiedFirst seen Aug 6, 2003
WU-FTPD 2.6.0/2.6.1/2.6.2 - 'realpath()' Off-by-One Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-74✓ verifiedFirst seen Aug 3, 2003
WU-FTPD 2.6.2 - Off-by-One Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-22974✓ verifiedFirst seen Aug 2, 2003
WU-FTPD 2.6.2 - 'realpath()' Off-by-One Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-22976✓ verifiedFirst seen Jul 31, 2003
FreeBSD 4.8 - 'realpath()' Off-by-One Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
4 shownDebian:3.0:wu-ftpd
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-193
- CVE-2003-0625EG 7.5EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2003-0252EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2003-0356EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2004-0005EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2002-1816EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2002-1721EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2002-1745EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2002-0844EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2002-0653EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2004-0346EG 7.8EPSS p93HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2003-0466?
When was CVE-2003-0466 disclosed?
Is CVE-2003-0466 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2003-0466?
How do I remediate CVE-2003-0466?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2003-0466
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2003-0466?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.